Abortion opponents say laws limiting anti-abortion demonstrations near clinics violate their First Amendment rights. The high court turned down the appeals in orders handed down Monday.
The two cases questioned a longstanding precedent that upheld such laws, which opponents say violate free speech rights.
Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from the court’s refusal to reconsider a 25-year-old precedent upholding “buffer zones” ...
Russia’s emphasis on what it deems family values comes from the top, but some of the policies that most impact Russians are ...
The Supreme Court turned away two appeals asking the justices to overrule a 25-year-old decision that allowed for buffer ...
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and ...
The cities argued that the restrictions were enacted to curb disturbing behavior from protesters outside health care facilities.
The Supreme Court opted against hearing arguments in a pair of appeals Monday seeking to wipe out protest buffer zones around ...
The US Supreme Court dealt a setback to abortion opponents, refusing to reconsider a 2000 decision that lets states and cities create protective zones to shield patients from being approached near ...
The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Monday to hear a challenge to the legality of buffer zones used to protect access to ...
Abortion opponents wanted the Supreme Court to scrap protest restrictions around clinics. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito ...